A live event I was hosting at my Poppyport airport & seaport was attacked on Friday night by somebody using a griefing HUD to drop particle bombs. 1983 Malayalam Movie Song Free Download there. I have ascertained that the griefing tool in question is over 2 years old & is on open sale on Marketplace from at least three different sellers.

Feb 28, 2011. In an odd turn of events that is all too common online these days, an ingenious system created for Second Life land holders to reduce incidents of harassment and abuse by malicious griefers has itself turned out to be a potentially nefarious tool of harassment and abuse. ZF RedZone is a tool that was.

The 'bomb' he used costs 50L (about $0.20 US) on the SL marketplace, not thousands. It's not illegal and all it does is some. The login server is separate from the sim servers and there is zero chance this guy could have taken that down, even with griefing tools. So that display of being unable to log in not. You definitely want to watch this one all the way to the end. Judge Jeanine. GoonSquad CopyBot Forum >SECOND LIFE PRODUCTS >SCRIPTS >GRIEFING. GoonSquad CopyBot Forum is a place where you can get items for Second Life and other vitual worlds for free. With our CopyBot viewers you can export and import any content from these viryual worlds and modify them in 3D.

There is even a promo video on Youtube. This HUD has no other purpose than for use as a griefing tool. I might add that the griefer concerned has already been the subject of multiple Abuse Report submissions and that it is not him who I am concerned about in this instance, it is the fact that the griefing tool used is on open sale via Marketplace. The question is: How do I file an Abuse Report which covers a number of items on Marketplace and where the amount of detail involved and its nature means that it is not easily submitted using the regular inworld Abuse Report tool? Any other informed advice would be welcome, thanks!

PS: The HUD in question has no other possible use except as a griefing tool used to mount Denial of Service attacks and is not even thinly veiled - one Marketplace description for example says '12 VIDEOcrashers Dancehall Riddim Download Free more. !!!attack,crash,spam Just choose the target!' A gun may also have a legitimate use for defense or target practice or hunting deer or by police or military. This HUD can only be used for griefing. Moreover, it is not simply 'annoying' when I have a live event attacked with a performer to whom I have paid L$4,000.

PPS: It is also incorrect to say that this kind of listing is allowed - Marketplace Guidelines say under 'Disallowed Actions': Listings for harmful or disruptive content The SL Marketplace is not to be used for transmitting content or code that may be harmful, impede other users' functionality, invade other users' privacy, or negatively impact Second Life or the Second Life Marketplace systems. Yeah, tools like this tend to be made by complete failures who nonetheless believe that they are 1337 haxxors. They believe that having discovered some exploit or flawed piece of code and having no moral qualms about selling it makes them special.which it does, for certain meanings of 'special', I suppose. And yeah, unfortunately LL doesn't generally do anything about these tools. However, they will often act to close the exploits that allow them to function. And over time I've come to agree that this is a better means of dealing with the problem, since there will always be some other fuckup willing to step in and sell these sorts of products.

There are two things I would like to see: (1) A means of preventing particles crossing parcel borders in the same way as you can enable/disable Object Entry on your land, and (2) Autoreturn enabled by default on all land, to make it more difficult for griefing objects to spread. You're proving Argent's point about how closing exploits can go too far. Particles are rendered clientside. They can be turned off or turned down easily, and draw distance can be adjusted such that the particle emitter's LOD is no longer sufficient for it to be rendered. Enabling autoreturn on all land would be a similarly bad idea. There are some reasons why some places might not wish to enable auto return, such as if they have large builds in progress where not all prims are set to the land ownership group (or where the land is not group owned). You're proving Argent's point about how closing exploits can go too far.

Particles are rendered clientside. They can be turned off or turned down easily, and draw distance can be adjusted such that the particle emitter's LOD is no longer sufficient for it to be rendered. Enabling autoreturn on all land would be a similarly bad idea.